I want to make it clear this is not a review. These are my first impressions of MY copy of the newly released Fuji X-Pro2
I posted a similar thread the other day and my post was met with a lot of mean-spirited attacks. If you feel the need to call me an idiot or any other pejorative term I will report you as spam.
I purchased my copy of the X-Pro2 March 4th. I used it for a photo shoot March 6th. I was using my Quantum T5D-R* as off camera flash triggered by Pocket Wizards. The “on camera” transmitter was a Pocket Wizard MiniTT1 for Canon. If you know anything about Pocket Wizards you know that the MiniTT1 can be set in basic triggering mode which causes it to act like any other Pocket Wizard. The flash had a PlusX attached as the receiver. The lens I was using the 50-140mm f2.8 R LM OIS WR.
While shooting I got a “internal temperature warning” screen. I turned off the camera and when I turned it back on and got the same screen. To the touch nothing felt warm, much less hot. When I removed the OEM battery it felt fine. In short, the tactile heat inspection of the camera and battery passed with flying colors. I then changed the transmitter from the MiniTT1 to a PlusX and didn’t have this issue for the rest of the shoot. I also noticed that my camera setting had completely reset to the factory original settings. I did call Fuji and gave them this information and they said they would pass it on to Japan. Very nice person at customer service by the way.
To be fair, the issue could have been with the MiniTT1 but I’ve never had this issue when I used the MiniTT1 with my XT-1, XE-2, Pentax 645z or Leica M Type 240. My guess is that Fuji will provide a firmware fix shortly. One great thing about Fuji is they do an excellent job providing firmware updates. I did call and talk to Pocket Wizard support as well. They confirmed that the fact the MiniTT1 was for Canon is a non issue seeing how it is designed to work with any camera as a basic flash trigger. The TTL functionality specific to Canon has zero affect on the basic triggering mode.
One other thing I noticed was the slow write speed. I was using Delkin 633x SD cards and it was noticeably slow. But I have since purchased Lexar 1000x cards and no longer have an issue withe write speed. The AF seems a good, maybe slightly better than my XT-1. Again, this is just my eyeball test. Nothing scientific here.
I feel compelled to state one more time that these are MY first impressions of MY X-Pro2. I had the X100 in my hands the day it came out, same with the X-Pro1. I have been sooting Fuji X system for wedding sine 2013. Yes, I know how to set the camera settings. No, I’m not an idiot. THIS IS NOT A REVIEW
*I have since switched to the Elinchrom Ranger Quadra for my location lighting.
I connected the MiniTT1 to the X-Pro2 again with a different battery and lens and itmdidmthe same thing. As soon as I powered up the camer I received the internal temperature warning. Used the MiniTT1 On my other cameras with zero issue. Also if you follow the Fuji X Forum you will read a lot of posts about a lot of issues with the X-Pro2.
PROBLEM IDENTIFIED: The X-Pro2 has the additional flash hot shoe post for supplying power to the flash much like that of the XT-1. This extras post seems to be the culprit. I will find out of the solution I’ve come up with fixes the issue permanently. That solution being, buying a single post hotel short adapter and mounting the MiniTT1 to it and therefore bypassing the power supply post on the cameras hot shoe.
In order to fill the void between wedding shoots I offer actor head shots and am learning the art of food photography. While learning the latter I noticed something interesting. I notice there are glaring differences between the Fuji XT-1 and Nikon D800. The first difference that jumps out at you are the colors. One is not better than the other but the differences are eye-popping and very noticeable. The second and equally as noticeable difference is the sharpness and resolution with the clear winner being the…
When it comes to gear I hear all the time that: “the camera is just a tool”. While that much is true I would like to point out that you would not use a roll of paper towels to hammer a nail now would you? A ridiculous example I know but back to my point. Yes, the camera is just a tool and each tool serves its purpose and the Fuji XT-1 is no different. I am a huge Fuji X fan, I mean HUGE fan of these cameras. I use the X-Pro1, XE-2 and the XT-1 and by use I mean this is what I carry to shoot 100% of my weddings! The reasons why I shoot the Fuji X series for wedding are many, and I’ll list some (but not all) of them for you:
- Light weight
- Amazing low light shooters
- Great skin tones
- Stunning B&W images
- Amazing fast lenses with my favorite being the; 56mm 1.2, 23mm 1.4 and 35mm 1.4
When it comes to flash photography the Fuji’s do just OK, but wireless manual flash using my Pocket Wizard in tandem with my Quantum T5-dr’s are as good as anything else compared to any other camera. Because the Fuji X system cameras are such amazing low light shooters I find myself using less and less flash. With that said there are some limitations to these cameras the caused me to pick up a Nikon D800 and I’ll get into these reasons now.
Back to my opening statement. The D800 is not only a great camera but it nicely fills the void left by the Fuji’s. What void you ask? Well, I’ll tell you. First off the D800’s auto focus is, well, better. As in, no comparison, even with the newest firmware update on the XT-1. Yea, yea, yea, I know that XT-1 is not designed to compete directly with the pro end DSLR’s, but I am a pro and I am going to talk about this anyway because using the right tool for the job matters! The other area of difference is the resolution. At 36 megapixels the D800 captured more detail, period! Where I noticed this was when I was shooting food and this is where detail is critical and the D800 did not disappoint. When severe cropping is needed he D800 retains all of the detail, even at a 100% crop which makes the Nikon D800 is the clear winner. The sharpness, colors and full frame-ness of the D800 really shines in this and other areas of photography.
Where Fuji has the advantage is in the area of mobility and stunning black and white photography. For all of my street photography the only thing I will use is my Fuji X-Pro1 and 35mm 1.4 & 23 1.4. I adore the Fuji as a travel camera. In fact that’s all I ever take with me when traveling. I am headed back home to New Orleans in August and my XE-2 and X-Pro 1 will be with me for sure. They are do wedding dresses better than anything else I’ve used. They are almost noiseless up to 3200 ISO. They are silent, discreet and most of all my back is not killing me at the end of a 12 hour wedding. The auto focus is much improved and the lenses, well those lenses are simply put, YUMMY!
So, is the camera “just a tool”? In short, yes. The right tool for the right job in the hands of the right person matters more in my humble opinion. When you need the most in the way of detail, sharpness, resolution and cropping the clear winner is the Nikon D800. But when you want B&W photos and for shooting brides the Fuji wins. So is there room for both a DSLR and a Fuji X camera in you bag? Yes, there is plenty of room for both and the amazing thing about living in “Merica is that you can have both!
Above D800 100% crop
Above XT-1 10% crop with 18-55 2.8-4.0 R
Above Fuji XT-1 with 56mm 1.2
Above D800 no crop
With all the new fangled, fancy pants, digital gee-wiz-a-bang’s being released seemingly on a weekly basis, I decided to stop! I decided to stop buying the latest and greatest version of what I already have. I have the Fuji XT1 and love it but I also KEPT my Fuji X-Pro 1, and here’s why.
- Just because Fuji released something new does not make my X Pro-1 a bad camera.
- The B&W I get from the X-Pro 1 is more like film than any other camera I’ve used, X100s a close 2nd
- It’s focusing is fast enough, certainly faster than I can manually focus my Leica M6
- It’s a pretty tough camera. In fact I have my XE-2 repaired from a slight drop where as the X-Pro 1 still works
- The X-Pro 1 fits my hands perfectly. I love rangefinders and this is a rangefinder-ey as you can get
Now, please keep in mind that cost does factor into this process, but not to the degree you might be thinking. I have learned that when you find something that just works keep using it until it breaks. Then get it repaired and keep using it until it needs to be replaced. Then buy a used X-Pro 1 from B&H or KEH then repeat the steps above.
I have always, and guess always will, wrestle with the film vs. digital thing with no clear winner in sight. The Fuji X-Pro 1 is the only digital camera I have used that comes closest to the look of B&W film. And for me that matters. I rarely shoot in color but when I do I am equally pleased with the color files. I still use the heck out of my X-Pro 1 at weddings. It along with the X100s are amazing wedding cameras!
In the end as long as my X-Pro 1 works and Fuji updates the firmware I will keep shooting it. I liken the X-Pro 1 to Alanis Morrissette’s “Jagged Little Pill” album, they both got it right the first time!
I am sure some of you who read this will take exception to what I am about to say, and well, ok then. But for most of you my opinion will make sense.
I have been a professional wedding and portrait photographer for over 14 years. And in that time I have seen many trends in photography. From the use of caution tape to models posing with pit bulls. All of that, as cliche as it was, were trends with relation to style and concept. The trend that I am seeing now is far more troublesome to the professional photographer. And that is the “dumbing down” of the client.
When digital came into it’s own the debate over the death of film raged. I always held the opinion that film use would diminish but not disappear. The same way that photography diminished the painter. Instead I took the stance that with digital and the internet would be a vessel that would contain millions upon millions of images. On the surface this seems like a great idea but in reality it is very dangerous to us professionals out there. The “how” is simple really. The internet viewer is bombarded with these images and 99% of which have no regard to quality. From the duck-face photo of the hot chick on Facebook to the ever so classy “look at my ab’s in the gym mirror” photo. All of which are taken with cell phone cameras with zero regards to quality. This list could go on and one but I will spare you this time.
Now, here is where it gets a little more complex. With each crap photograph piling upon the other crap photographs, the viewer, aka, bride to be, actor needing head shots, family wanting portraits and so on, are lead to believe what they are seeing is what is now considered a “quality” photograph. The are being brain washed into accepting low quality crap images are the norm and sadly this has become the new standard. Try as we professionals might, the dumbing down of the average viewer will have a permanent impact on those of us who make a living with out cameras.
The flood of digital images have forced most professional to lower their pricing to try to stave off the influx of so called”wanna-be”, Cragislist photographers. These part-time, weekend warriors are the ones that will do a whole wedding for $500.00. My issue is not the GWC (guy with camera) trying to make a buck. My issue is with the client. The bride who has been so condition into believing that what she is seeing on Pintrest and Facebook is the norm. She has become oblivious to the fact that she should to expect MORE in the way of quality from her photographer rather being forced to settle for low quality crap images.
Most clients have devalued true professional photography. They are willing to settle for low quality images for the sake of savings. The real issue is that the clients are right! They know they can hey a GWC for $500.00 and be ok with just “ok images. The super majority of photographers are not professionals, they are simply GWC’s and don’t care about quality or customer service. And this is the core issue. The clients are being duped into accepting low quality because that is all they have seen. And to be frank, I do not see this trend changing. So what can we do? Nothing really. We can keep buying the newest $3,500.00 digital cameras and hope for the best!
If you are looking for high quality and yet affordable wedding and bridal photography then In Style Photography is your place!
It’s OK, it’s just a photo shoot!
From time to time I come across a person or a couple who just cannot relax in front of the camera. This is unusual by any means. In fact few people are 100% comfortable being the center of attention. Not all of us are an attention seeking Kardashian! OK with that said below are a few tips which might help you when you have to get your head shot, model beauty shot or engagement/bridal photo:
- Be yourself! Too many time people feel the need to “act” instead of simply being who they are
- Move! As in actually move. I do not mean sprint like you’re in a race, but simple move and sway
- Take a deep breath. I know this sounds so simple but it really does work. Heck, take 2 deep breaths, couldn’t hurt
- If you have the choice shoot in a location that’s familiar to you. Strangers and storage places add to you being uncomfortable
- Feel comfortable with the photographer. Rather a good photographer will go out of their way to make you feel comfortable and safe
As you can see, nothing on this list is terrible complicated. In fact it’s pretty darn basic. But of none of this works, there’s alway wine!
To book my service please visit www.instylephotogrpahy.net or simply send a message using the contact form listed below. Have a rest week form your jolly ole photographer Scott Evans with In Style Photography in Houston, TX
Does the personality of your photographer really matter?
Of course I am going to say yes to this question, and I do have my reasons . When selecting your photographer most have been told to look at three things: price, quality of work and experience. While I cannot argue with any of those suggestions I would like to add a fourth to this list, personality!
If you stop to think about it for a moment you will realize that you will be spending the majority of your wedding day next to and interacting with your wedding photographer. Same goes with your guests! With this said, ask yourself this simple question; Do you want to be around a grumpy old, “I hate my job” kind of photographer? Or do you want to be around one who is fun, funny, has the ability to relax you and not get stressed out and most of all, one who really enjoys their job?
I would add this component to your selection process when deciding on your photographer be it for your; wedding, family portrait or any photographic event. So the next time you are talking to a prospective photographer try to ascertain whether her/she is relaxed, open and fun. I am not talking hiring a stand up comic, but hire one that at least has a sense of humor!
If you have decided to have anything photographed the obviously it is important to you, so a full time professional photographer is vital!
For more information about Scott Evans and In Style Photography click here
How to choose your wedding photographer:
- Do not shop by price alone
- Ask if they are full time
- Can they provide references
- Are they willing to meet with you prior to booking
- Do they put what they promise in writing
- Are they nice
- Ask if they took the images that are on their website
These are some of the basics when choosing a wedding or portrait photographer. Below are my opinions on what I feel is important when choosing your photographer:
1) If you are shopping price alone you are doing yourself a disservice. Think about this for a second. Your wedding photos will outlast everything else associated with your wedding. They will outlast your cake, food, D.J, flowers and even your dress. So why in the world would you go “cheap” on the one thing that will outlast all others?
2) A fill time photographer usually means they are serious, committed to quality and customer service driven. Part time photographers will say they are “professional” when in fact they are not. They are low cost for a reason and that reason is because they are using your wedding for their practice!
3) Asking for references is something I conflicted about. What I mean is, no one will ever give the name of someone who is going to say bad things about their photography. So what can you do to get information to help you make the right decision? The internet! Google them, Yelp them. It is up to you to do your research before writing your deposit check. But still ask and if they refuse to give references do NOT hire them!
4) If the photographer is not willing to meet with you prior to booking this is a HUGE red flag. I would go so far as to say immediately remove them from your list. If they are not willing to meet prior to booking then they may not be willing to actually show up for your wedding!
5) A true, honest, legitimate and professional photographer will always put what you agree to for services in writing. I provide a contract to all my clients. If you do NOT get it in writing then you have no legal recourse if things go bad! Simply put; no contract, no sale!
6) Are they nice? Well, they sure should be right! The photographer will have more interaction with you and your guests than any other vendor you hire. If your photographer is grumpy and lacks personality with you on the phone image how they will be at your wedding. Trust your gut and hire someone who is nice. In the long run “nice” really does matter.
7) Why ask if they took all the images on their website? Because beginners, part-timers or like I like to call them, “weekend warriors” use stolen or stock images to sell their services. Some may have had an assistant shoot the images and are passing them off as their own. When you hire a photographer make sure they are the ones who will actually be taking the photos!
There are a lot of things to consider when choosing your photographer but the one thing that gets ignored the most during this process is your gut feeling. If you trust what your gut is telling your, both good and bad, and you learn to trust it then you should be ok in the end.
If you have any questions please vista me on-line at: http://www.instylephotography.net
I have been doing some Fuji bashing lately, well deserved bashing might I add, but I thought I would take a break from flogging the Fuji horse and talk about something positive with the Fuji X system. I am talking about the Fuji 55-210 3.5-4.8 R LM OIS!
We all know I have a huge issue with the claims that the new Fuji XT1 is a DSLR killer, which it is not by they way, but I digress. I was in Houston Camera Exchange about 3 weeks ago and was looking to buy something. Didn’t really care what, just knew I wanted to buy something, anything! After looking around I spotted a few used Fuji X lenses and I asked mi amigo Craig what he had on the shelf and low and behold a used 55-210! I asked how much. He gave a price. I scoffed and said, here is what I can pay today, and he said OK! My mission was accomplished. Plus I didn’t think I’d get hurt too bad at an out the door price of $350.00.
With my Canon 70-200 2.8 IS II long since sold I was concerned that when shooting weddings I did not have a lens that would be long enough to accommodate the Catholics. We fellow wedding photographer know how the Catholics love to put us photographers way in the back, turn out all the lights and say NO FLASH! With the lens costing a just $350.00, I figured it was a low enough price to take a calculated risk. An added bonus is the crop factor is 1.5x which make this a seriously long reaching lens. I must say I did feel more comfortable and confident knowing I had this lens in my bag. And now I could shoot a wedding without ticking off the Catholics LOL! So now my thoughts:
I was on my way to shoot a wedding at the end of March with my newest lens (yes latest firmware installed) and had my XT1, X Pro-1, XE-2 and X100s in my bag. The XE-2 held the 18-55 and the XT1 was adorned with my new’/used 55-210. Right away I noticed how smooth everything was on the lens. The autofocus was pert-near silent and actually pretty responsive. Now keep in mind, I was shooting in the prefect sun-setting, beautiful light. The zoom function was buttery smooth and the feel of this lens on the XT1 was substantial, in a good way. Everything felt solid and well balanced. Oh yea, you must use the new grip for the XT1 to get that balanced feel. All in all the lens felt good, no, felt great in my hands. But what about performance?
I must admit I had little to no expectations as to the image quality of this lens, after all it’s a “kit lens” and what pro would ever dream of using one of those things? As I snapped the first few test shots before the bride strolled down the isle I noticed the images on the back of the camera where sharp, I mean fixed lens sharp. The colors and contrast were what you would expect from the Fuji XF lenses. To be honest I was stunned with what I was seeing and crossed my fingers that the quality would be the same on my iMac. And so far so good!
Fuji XT1 with 55-210 3.5-4.8 OIS.
As you can see from the .jpeg images above (Lightroom did not have a RAW plugin yet) not bad. Not bad for a “kit lens and most of all not bad for $350.00! I will freely admit that I was spoiled by the Fuji 35mm 1.4 on my X Pro-1. That combo just may be the greatest lens/camera combo to date. Take that Leica lovers! All kidding aside, the image quality was not only more than acceptable it was down right fantastic! Will I use this lens more? I already have. in fact I use it at every event I shoot now. Understanding this lens is slow and therefore you will not do as well in low light, even with a superb OIS lens stabilization, but for what it is and for the price point, even new, this lens is a steal! If you are trying to decide what to add to your bad I implore you to take a long and lustful look at the surprise Fuji 55-210 3.5-4.8 OIS. You will be glad you did!